-
holyfamilypenguin4,5593
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
A story of of a prison demon and the paddle from the turn of the century Ohio.
Ira Marlatt from first link to last one the prison demon to an angel of mercy.
They paddled him until there was no place left to paddle.
May 1897
When I took charge of the Penitentiary in May, 1897, after an interval of six years, I found that it had retrograded that it was fifty years behind in its reformatory mission. “A reign of terror” in which stripping men naked and paddling them for the slightest infraction of the rules was one of the existing features, and on the other hand a capricious mode of treatment was in vogue which fondled the convict in the afternoon and paddled him in the morning
August 1897
January 1898
-
KKxyz3,59957
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
It seems most unlikely that school paddling were derived from prison practice, which became extremely harsh.
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
http://books.google.ca/books?ei=IperToP … RKAQAAIAAJ
Biennial report and opinions of the Attorney General of the state of Illinois Illinois. Attorney General’s Office, State Printers, 1917
Page 970-
SCHOOLS – CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF PUPILS – WHAT PERMISSIBLE – LAW CONSIDERED There is no law prescribing the instrument to be used by a school teacher in the punishment of pupils. Such a law would be exceedingly unwise and improper. A small switch may be used more cruelly by one person than a leather strap, or a wooden paddle, by another person.
General principles of law prevailing, as announced in the text books, are to the effect that in order to compel compliance with reasonable rules and regulations, a school teacher may inflict reasonable corporal punishment upon a pupil for disobedience, insubordination, or other gross misconduct.
The teacher, however, must adapt the punishment to the nature of the offense and to the age and mental condition and personal attributes of the offending pupil; and, considering the circumstances and conditions of the particular offense and the particular pupil, the punishment must not be inflicted with such force, or in such manner, as to cause the same to be cruel, excessive, wanton or malicious.
The question whether punishment inflicted in a particular instance was cruel, excessive, wanton or malicious, is a question for the courts, to be decided by court or jury after hearing and considering all the circumstances and conditions connected with the particular case.
October 11, 1916.
Mr. J. M. Simmons, R. P. D. No. 2. Grantsburg, I11.
DEAR SIR: I have your letter of October 9, inquiring what punishment teachers in the common public schools are allowed to administer and what they are allowed to use in administering punishment. You state that your teacher has been using a leather strap and a wooden paddle, and that he whipped a small boy with the leather strap until the blood ran down his leg and he whipped another small boy with the wooden paddle and made a stripe about four inches long and a half an inch wide, almost bloodshot. You further state that section 114 of the School Law says that the directors can adopt and enforce all necessary rules and regulations for the management and government of the public schools of their district, and you also state that the directors in this instance were called in and instructed the teacher to use a small switch but that the teacher claims he may punish with anything he chooses.
It is apparent from your letter that this is a matter in which it would be entirely improper and beyond my powers to interfere. It would appear that the controversy is between the teacher and the board of directors. If the board of directors wish any advice, the School Law provides that it is the duty of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction to construe the law.
I think a little reflection will convince you that it would not do for two departments of the State Government to take jurisdiction over the same matter; such action might result in a conflict between the two departments and interfere with the orderly conduct of the affairs of the government.
However, there is one sentence in your letter which, perhaps, calls for further explanation. You state that you know that I know all about what a teacher is allowed to punish with and how much and that you will be very glad for me to tell you.
There is no law fixing “what a teacher is allowed to punish with” and it would be a very bad law, if it existed. A small switch may be used more cruelly by one person than a leather strap or wooden paddle by another person. The law is as stated in the Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure:
“As a general rule a school teacher, in an far as it may be reasonably necessary to the maintenance of the discipline and efficiency of the school, and to compel a compliance with reasonable rules and regulations, may inflict reasonable corporal punishments upon a pupil for insubordination, disobedience, or other misconduct, . The infliction of corporal punishment by a teacher is largely within his discretion; but he must exercise sound discretion and judgment in determining the necessity for corporal punishment and the reasonableness thereof, under the varying circumstances of each particular case, and must adapt the punishment to the nature of the offense and to the age and mental condition and personal attributes of the offending pupil, and, considering the circumstances and conditions of the particular offense and pupil, the punishment must not be inflicted with such force or in such manner as to cause it to be cruel or excessive, or wanton or malicious.” 35 Cyc. 1137.
Whether the punishment inflicted was cruel or excessive, or wanton or malicious is a question for the courts, to be decided by a jury after considering the circumstances and conditions of the particular punishment in question.
Very respectfully,
P. J. Lucey, Attorney General.
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
There is clear evidence that both wood and leather paddles were used on slaves and later for prison discipline. The punishments were often very severe and various investigations were conducted: The following is an excerpt from one such.
______________________________________
Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1882 v.5.
STATE OF NEW YORK
No. 131
IN ASSEMBLY, May 5, 1882
TESTIMONY TAKEN BEFORE THE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON STATE PRISONS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SING SING PRISON
Page 35-
http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b2998328 … %3Bseq=787
[. . .]
Q. Have you any knowledge of the amount or degree of punishment inflicted in the prison?
A. Yes, sir; a general knowledge.
Q. Does it take place under your observation?
A. No, sir, it does not.
Q. Never?
A. No, sir.
Q. You have never seen a case of punishment?
A. Yes, I have seen a case of punishment.
Q. Then punishment does take place under your observation?
A. I have seen punishment inflicted.
Q. Have you witnessed the punishment of paddling?
A. Yes, sir, I have.
Q. Will you describe it to the committee?
A. Well, the prisoner is usually handcuffed, and the handcuffs hooked over a hook in the wall, and he is spanked with a leather paddle.
Q. With a leather paddle?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Give us an idea of the size and weight of the paddle?
A. Well, I could draw it.
Mr. Clapp It is a leather strap?
A. Yes.
By Mr. Keyes:
Q. About how long is it?
A. The flat parts about that width (Indicating the width.)
Q. About four inches wide?
A. Yes, sir ; and the flat part is about a foot long, and the handle about sixteen inches.
Q. How thick is the leather?
A. About the ordinary thickness of the leather.
Q. Of sole leather?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. How long is the handle?
A. I should think about a foot or sixteen inches ; that is simply a continuation of the leather.
Q. Who are present during the infliction of the punishment? Please state whether the flat part of the paddle is punctured with holes?
A. No, sir ; I never saw any to be used in that way.
Q. Please state who are present ordinarily on the infliction of such punishment?
A. The principal keeper.
Q. Is he always present?
A. He always is whenever I have seen it; I suppose he always is in the room, and also the doctor.
Q. You have been present?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What was the occasion of your being present?
A. I simply happened to be there in the keeper’s office; I never went there out of curiosity ; I simply happened to be there.
Q. And was the punishment in such cases generally inflicted on your complaint?
A. No, sir; no man has ever been paddled on my complaint.
Q. Is there a limit as to the number of strokes allowed to be inflicted?
A. That I couldn’t say.
Q. Practically how many strokes are given as far as you know?
A. I have seen one upwards to eight.
Q. Not more than eight?
A. I couldn’t say of my own knowledge; I don’t know that I ever saw punishment where I thought it exceeded eight.
Q. What is the appearance of the person of the convict after the strokes of the paddle?
A. I don’t know that I ever paid much attention to that.
Q. What are the immediate results?
A. Well it appears to be a rather painful infliction.
Q. Is blood often drawn?
A. I have never seen blood drawn.
Q. Is the flesh discolored?
A. I never have seen that; I should think possibly it might be.
Q. Did you ever see the convict several hours or two or three days after the infliction of the punishment?
A. No, sir; I don’t know that I ever did.
Q. Only during the immediate time of the infliction?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What is the office of the surgeon or physician on such occasions?
A. As I understand it he is there to see that the punishment is not too severe.
Q. Does it cease upon his direction?
A. It would if he should give any direction for it to cease; I have never seen a man under punishment where the doctor thought it necessary to stop the punishment.
Q. Do I understand you to say that the blows are inflicted by the principal keeper himself?
A. I have seen the principal keeper himself inflict the blows.
Q. Is it customary for him so to do?
A. I never saw that punishment inflicted, excepting the principal keeper did it.
Q. Is it customary for the convict to cry out as though in pain, during such punishment?
A. Usually; yes, sir.
Q. To what extent do such demonstrations occur?
A. It is rather owing to who the convict is. Some will stand half a dozen blows without crying out, and I have seen others when the first blow is given cry out as though their life depended upon it, and not very serious blows either.
Mr. O’Brien – It depends upon how much game they have got?
A. Yes, sir.
By Mr. Keyes:
Q. The amount of outcry don’t depend upon the number of strokes given them?
A. No, sir; nor the severity of the punishment.
Q. The flesh is naked in this punishment?
A. Usually; I have seen it applied with the clothes on, in the ordinary way.
Q. Are there any other kinds of punishment employed in the prison.
A. The dark cell – locking up in the dark cell.
[. . .]
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
May 23, 1882Report of the Committee on State Prisons Concerning the Management of the State Prison at Sing Singhttp://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b2998328 … %3Bseq=337
[Assem. Doc. No. 120.]
By resolution of this House your committee were charged with the duty of investigating the charges made against the management of the State prison located a Sing Sing. These charges were, in substance,
“that the prison was run in the interest of the contractors;
that the moral welfare of the convicts is neglected;
that many of them are compelled to work on Sundays;
that certain notorious criminals are treated with distinguished consideration, while others in a sick and enfeebled condition are treated with great severity; and
that other serious evils exist in connection with the management of said prison.”
These charges were made by Mr. Elihu E. Campbell, a discharged keeper of the prison, and by certain discharged prisoners, and were extensively published in the New York Herald and other leading papers. Most of the charges related, it is true, to prisoners long since deceased, and reflected rather upon the preceding than upon the present management of the prison. But the gravity of the charges, and the earnestness of those who made and circulated them, seemed to demand an investigation of them. We have, therefore, examined a large number of witnesses, including the warden, physician, principal keeper, and other officers of the prison, ex-keepers, contractors, prisoners and discharged prisoners, in relation to the charges in question, and have carefully considered the same. Our conclusions are embodied in the following propositions:
[. . .]
May 5, 1882 Testimony Taken Before the Assembly Committee on State Prisons in the Investigation of Sing Sing Prisonhttp://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b2998328 … %3Bseq=753
[Assem. Doc. No. 131.]
-
holyfamilypenguin4,5593
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
July 22, 2011 KK gave an excellent account on the Nation’s First Reformatory, Elmira, NY. This I hope will give the readers of this estimable Forum some further background and I am sure this is not altogether unfamiliar to our master researcher KK
An almost perfect prison.
Fifty years of prison service: an autobiography By Zebulon Reed Brockway
But some others, the few, were so constituted, or habituated, that they could not, or at least did not and such characters generally do not properly respond to the training methods without the aid of some physical collision that suddenly disturbs the existent prevalent objectionable mood.
Of three measures which are effective for such a purpose, namely, the douche, electricity, and a quickening slap, the last alone was used at the reformatory, and for the following reasons. The difficulty of regulating with precision, the effect of a dash of water to the variant sensitiveness of the different persons, debarred the douche from our service. Electricity was excluded for the same reason, and also, because of its use for the electrocution of criminals, it has acquired a certain stigma; while the slap, or spanking,offensively named “paddling,” was chosen for this remedial use because of its safe, easy, accurate adjustment. Since the three instrumentalities have each and all of them been used and become known as means of punishment, and since the notion of punishment is, in the common conception, so associated with them, I venture to repeat that the use of physical compulsion in our reformatory was never for punishment; never used for measuring de- * merit; nor was it ever used with intent to directly affect the subject’s free will ” to subdue him.” No doubt the effect was, sometimes, educative of the judgment, suggestive of what is good or bad policy to pursue, but even that object was not directly in view. Indeed, the conscious immediate object was scarcely an appeal to the intellect at all, or only indirectly so. The immediate purpose was to effect some change in the channels of the mental activities. Any such eruptive change must be helpful to the subject to break away from the bad mood; and might initiate a good change of the habitual conduct. But it is fair to say, as no doubt will be suggested, that the means might not produce the intended effect. However, the management felt themselves recreant to their duty until the effort had been made the experiment had been tried; and so many and such signal successes had been already achieved by this means that there could be no longer any doubt of their duty in the matter.
-
KKxyz3,59957
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
School Board Decrees Use of Soft Paddle for Spanking Special Correspondence, THE NEW YORK TIMES August 30, 1931, page E5
Source: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract. … 5B818FF1D3
PITTSBURGH, August 2?
[Snippet] A board of education in I3(?) County has come to a decision. Henceforth the paddle to be used in punishing pupils shall be of soft pine not more than ?? an inch in thickness. Moreover; the ?? of the school is to be at every such operation to see that the specifications are not exceeded. Recently a teacher the ?? of using a heavy paddle upon a ?? and there ?? threats of court action against members of the …
[Does anyone have access to the complete article?]
It seems unlikely that there would be a difference in effect of “soft” and “hard” woods due to their softness or hardness but their might well be an effect due to the likely difference in density of the woods and hence the weight of the paddles. A softwood might be as hard (deformable) as a hardwood. Both are very much less deformable the human flesh.
Some have been reluctant to be specify instruments to be used for punishment (e.g. Biennial report and opinions of the Attorney General of the state of Illinois above, October 31.) but there seems to have been a contrary trend in recent times. Of course, everyone agrees the punishment should not cause injury or lasting harm but usually without offering any quantitative data on how this is to be achieved.
-
Guest
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
Pine Paddles. the only comment I have heard is several southern teachers decrying the use of pine, not for reasons of effect but because it easily dries out and splits along the grain. This could be quite nasty . Hardwoods tend not to do this , I understand .
-
KKxyz3,59957
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
A century or so ago there was a lot of concern about delinquent and neglected children. Schools and homes were set up for their care, with the very best of intentions. Inadequate funding, over crowding, inadequate segregation of criminals from the neglected, and problems with recruiting suitable staff followed. Abuses and cruelty followed. Leather and wooden paddles were used in the state schools and homes. Attempts to moderate the excesses and abuses lead to some early attempts to regulate corporal punishment. It is possible ordinary schools later modeled their CP practices and rules on the State regulations.
JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 45th General Assembly OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
1908.
http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015065 … 3Bseq=1716
Page 1774-
[Report on the] St. Charles School for Boys [Illinois State Home for Delinquent Boys]
[. . .]
It may be stated at the outset that corporal punishment is forbidden by the long existing rules of the institution, adopted by the board of trustees. In lieu of corporal punishment there is provided a set of demerit marks and various forms of discipline other than brutal chastisement. Not only does the testimony of the officers charged with the care of these boys show flagrant violation of the rules and the instructions of the trustees regarding corporal punishment, but punishments have been inflicted on these friendless waifs, without system, intelligence or moderation. The spirit of force rather than of kindness seems to prevail.
The house father, the disciplinarian and the superintendent alike indiscriminately administered corporal punishment. The most usual form of punishment is administered by means of a paddle, described by one of the house fathers, Mr. Wiley, as “an oak paddle about four inches wide and about eighteen to twenty inches long, carried down to a handle, probably one-half inch thick.” (Record, page 9039).
The paddle is usually applied to the boys after they have retired. The boys in thin cotton night robes were required to bend forward and to circle around the officer while he wielded the paddle on their unprotected bodies. The horsewhip and other convenient instruments of punishment have been employed to enforce discipline. (Record, pages 9042 and 9043). According to the testimony of witnesses, violent and obscene epithets have been applied to some of the boys during punishment. (Record, pages 8960, 8961, 9081).
A short time following the appointment of the superintendent, Charles N. Hart, who was appointed March 6, 1906, there was instituted a cage (or solitary). During the fall of 1906 a case of horsewhipping of certain of the boys who had attempted to run away was reported to Governor Deneen. Mr. Hurley, president of the board of trustees, testified in reference to this case, “The first intimation I had was that time when Colonel Davis reported this horsewhipping and this cage; and Governor Deneen, in the presence of Mr. Hart, in Colonel Davis’ office in Springfield, said he had heard the report, and I remember Colonel Davis said that Mr. Hart said they had the cage and he had used a horsewhip; and at that meeting we abolished the cage and the horsewhip and ordered it removed, ordered the cage removed, and then we passed a rule that there should be no corporal punishment. (Record, page 8967).
Mrs. Hart, the wife of the superintendent, testified, “We had no way of punishing them (the boys) when we came here and corporal punishment was the only mode of punishment. All the officers carried straps, all of them, without exception, carried straps in their pockets, and they did not handle the boys without them. Mr. Hart’s method is not that at all, and he called them and asked for the straps and they handed them in at the office- He did not believe in that way of doing it. And it made quite a degree of feeling at first. The officers objected, said they didn’t handlecouldn’t do it without them.” (Record, page 9758).
The general use of the hard, unyielding oak “paddle” is far more brutal than the former strap. That the use of the horsewhip is continued during the administration of the present superintendent seems manifest from the testimony of C. A. Wiley, one of the house fathers, who stated that he witnessed the punishment of John Drake by Ward, who used a “big whip,” a buggy whip, and that Drake was “pretty well marked up.” (Record page 9043).
We find that the superintendent has not only tolerated and encouraged corporal punishment, but has himself administered the same and in the most public manner. One of the most degrading features of the situation is that the boys were even punished in groups and in the presence of other boys of the institution. One boy was kicked by a house father for praying too long. (Record, page 9144).
Another boy was severely punished by the disciplinarian because he admitted having said, “You will have to go to the priest to get anything out of me.” (Record, page 9100).
No corporal punishments appear of record at this institution, and no report of any punishment had been made to the board of trustees by the superintendent or any of his assistants until after reports had come, through a police officer, to the Hon. T. D. Hurley, president of the board of trustees, that there was brutal punishment being administered to the boys at St. Charles; thereupon Mr. Hurley told the officer to bring in the first runaway boy he caught, to let Mr. Hurley see him. (Record, page 8959.)
[. . .]
The paddle seems to be very much the preferred implement in USA schools. When did it first come into widespread use? I am particularly interested in early mentions of the school paddle in dated factual or fictional literature, and in official documents.Have other cultures used the paddle in schools?
European penalism and French paddling was the likely precursor of US hazing and the fraternity paddle. The slave paddle may also have contributed to US fraternity practice.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA – UNIVERSITY LECTURES DELIVERED BY MEMBERS OF THE FACULTY IN THE FREE PUBLIC LECTURE COURSE
1914-1915
http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b2983461 … =%3Bseq=57
Page 51-
STUDENT LIFE AT THE CLOSE OF THE MIDDLE AGES By Daniel B. Shumway
Professor of German Philology, University of Pennsylvania
To us in this age of universal education and compulsory schooling, when it is a rare thing to find an illiterate person, it seems hard to realize that there was a time in the history of man, and that not much more than a millennium ago, when children did not have to go to school, when they did not have to spend several hours every day in poring over their books, but were free to roam in the open air through the fields and forests; but such was the case. Before the advent of Christianity in Northern Europe, schools, in the strict sense of the word, were unknown. Children were, of course, taught how to use weapons, to hunt, to till the soil or instructed in some useful occupation or means of earning a livelihood, but education, in the way we use it today, did not exist.
[. . .]
Page 67
In France the [initiation] ceremony was somewhat different, the new student being looked upon not as a wild animal, but as a criminal who had to be first tried, then purged of his sins. From the institutes of the University of Avignon we learn that the freshmen had to serve the seniors at table, were not allowed to stand between them and the fire, were not permitted to sit at the first table nor to address each other as “domine” – i. e., sir. Whenever the “beanus” transgressed these rules his punishment consisted of a prescribed number of blows with a wooden paddle. During the purgation at the University of Aix, the “beanus” received three blows with a frying pan or a book from each one present. From a chance allusion we learn that it was the custom at the Sorbonne in Paris to wash the freshmen on Innocents’ Day. Previous to the ceremony of washing they had to ride upon donkeys in a procession through the streets of the city.
The university students of that day had not the freedom which they now enjoy. They were, as a rule, somewhat younger than is now the case, the average age of a freshman being from thirteen to sixteen, and they were treated as schoolboys who must be looked after. In fact, the medieval university resembled a big boarding school. The teachers and students, especially of the course in arts, lived together in the university buildings. Each university had several colleges to which the students belonged, just as in England today. When the number of students was too great to be accommodated in the university buildings, the different teachers or masters were allowed to keep boarding houses for the students. As all the living expenses were paid from a common purse – in Latin, “bursa” – the students were called “bursae.” This word has survived in the German word “Bursch,” meaning a fellow or lad, and in the English “bursar” or “purser,” really the keeper of the purse.
[. . .]